Car Running Costs: Kia Sedona
Below are our fuel costs for the 2002 Kia Sedona (2.9L diesel), showing the miles per gallon and cost per mile (fuel only).
Read more about the mismatch between published and real mpg figures.
Date | Mileage | Litres | Cost | MPG | Cost/Mile (£) |
2010-02-02 |
101953 |
62 |
70.58 |
- |
- |
2010-03-08 |
102446 |
61.53 |
66.42 |
36 |
0.135 |
2010-05-08 |
102881 |
62.45 |
76.76 |
31 |
0.176 |
2010-07-04 |
103388 |
60.88 |
73 |
37 |
0.144 |
2010-08-30 |
103874 |
63.44 |
76.7 |
34 |
0.158 |
2010-11-10 |
104334 |
54.98 |
63.77 |
38 |
0.139 |
2010-12-24 |
104672 |
42.56 |
52.73 |
36 |
0.156 |
2011-01-28 |
105152 |
59.1 |
70.01 |
37 |
0.146 |
2011-03-26 |
105619 |
59.2 |
81.64 |
35 |
0.175 |
2011-05-09 |
106165 |
65.14 |
92.44 |
38 |
0.169 |
2011-06-18 |
106685 |
60.16 |
82.24 |
39 |
0.158 |
2011-07-16 |
107161 |
64.48 |
89.56 |
33 |
0.188 |
2011-08-05 |
107685 |
60.88 |
84.56 |
39 |
0.161 |
2011-08-10 |
108026 |
50.04 |
70.01 |
31 |
0.205 |
2011-08-14 |
108524 |
66.37 |
91.52 |
34 |
0.184 |
2011-09-24 |
109081 |
61.49 |
87.26 |
41 |
0.157 |
2011-10-09 |
109515 |
57.38 |
77.98 |
34 |
0.180 |
2011-10-27 |
110055 |
61.86 |
84.56 |
39 |
0.157 |
2011-11-22 |
110562 |
68.86 |
97.02 |
33 |
0.191 |
2011-12-18 |
111138 |
70.35 |
99.13 |
37 |
0.172 |
2012-01-21 |
111700 |
68.64 |
98.5 |
37 |
0.175 |
2012-02-10 |
112028 |
39.85 |
55.75 |
37 |
0.170 |
2012-04-08 |
112529 |
56.93 |
83.63 |
40 |
0.167 |
2012-05-02 |
113100 |
70.04 |
100.79 |
37 |
0.177 |
2012-05-23 |
113652 |
60.39 |
84.49 |
41 |
0.153 |
2012-06-09 |
114077 |
59.92 |
68.25 |
32 |
0.161 |
2012-06-27 |
114601 |
63.57 |
85.76 |
37 |
0.164 |
2012-07-25 |
115182 |
68.12 |
92.58 |
38 |
0.159 |
2012-08-12 |
115712 |
57.6 |
80.58 |
41 |
0.152 |
2012-08-29 |
116237 |
67.63 |
95.29 |
35 |
0.182 |
2012-09-22 |
116793 |
63.85 |
91.88 |
39 |
0.165 |
2012-10-09 |
117247 |
56.54 |
80.23 |
36 |
0.177 |
2012-11-11 |
117796 |
64.62 |
91.06 |
38 |
0.166 |
2012-12-24 |
118309 |
62.03 |
85.54 |
37 |
0.167 |
Total running costs (fuel+repairs, services). The second column "Cum p/mile all costs" tells us what we spent (on average so far since purchase, per mile) to use our car.
Miles post purchase | Cum p/mile all costs | cum p/mile repairs | cum p/mile fuel | All Cum. costs £ | fuel cum. costs £ | Repairs cum. costs £
|
---|
460 | 126.3 | 126.3 | 0 | 581 | 0 | 581
|
---|
493 | 131.32 | 117.8 | 13.47 | 647 | 66.42 | 581
|
---|
700 | 93.14 | 93.1 | 0 | 652 | 0 | 652
|
---|
900 | 77.56 | 77.6 | 0 | 698 | 0 | 698
|
---|
928 | 90.64 | 75.2 | 15.43 | 841.18 | 143.18 | 698
|
---|
1387 | 64.82 | 64.8 | 0 | 899 | 0 | 899
|
---|
1435 | 77.71 | 62.6 | 15.06 | 1115.18 | 216.18 | 899
|
---|
1921 | 62.04 | 46.8 | 15.25 | 1191.88 | 292.88 | 899
|
---|
2381 | 52.74 | 37.8 | 14.98 | 1255.65 | 356.65 | 899
|
---|
2719 | 48.12 | 33.1 | 15.06 | 1308.38 | 409.38 | 899
|
---|
3199 | 43.09 | 28.1 | 14.99 | 1378.39 | 479.39 | 899
|
---|
3600 | 25.25 | 25.2 | 0 | 909 | 0 | 899
|
---|
3666 | 40.1 | 24.8 | 15.3 | 1470.03 | 561.03 | 909
|
---|
4212 | 37.1 | 21.6 | 15.5 | 1562.47 | 653.47 | 909
|
---|
4732 | 34.76 | 19.2 | 15.5 | 1644.71 | 735.71 | 909
|
---|
4767 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 1907 | 0 | 909
|
---|
5208 | 52.46 | 36.62 | 15.85 | 2732.27 | 825.27 | 1907
|
---|
5732 | 49.14 | 33.27 | 15.87 | 2816.83 | 909.83 | 1907
|
---|
6073 | 47.54 | 31.4 | 16.13 | 2886.84 | 979.84 | 1907
|
---|
6571 | 45.33 | 29.0 | 16.3 | 2978.36 | 1071.36 | 1907
|
---|
7128 | 43.01 | 26.7 | 16.25 | 3065.62 | 1158.62 | 1907
|
---|
7350 | 44.01 | 28.2 | 0 | 3234.7 | 1158.62 | 2076.08
|
---|
7543 | 43.15 | 27.8 | 0 | 3254.7 | 1158.62 | 2096.08
|
---|
7642 | 43.72 | 27.4 | 16.29 | 3341.3 | 1245.26 | 2096.08
|
---|
8182 | 41.87 | 25.6 | 16.29 | 3425.9 | 1329.82 | 2096.08
|
---|
8689 | 40.54 | 24.1 | 16.29 | 3522.9 | 1426.84 | 2096.08
|
---|
Miles post purchase | Cum p/mile all costs | cum p/mile repairs | cum p/mile fuel | All Cum. costs £ | fuel cum. costs £ | Repairs cum. costs £
|
---|
I find it quite interesting that our actual figures correspond so well to the estimates used and that I cited by Willis & Garrod research 15-20 years ago; ie, the actual running costs are 2.5x the fuel costs.
It's quiet in here...
Add your comment